Blog

  • The Deep Sea Dominion: How the Kings of Java in 1586 Pre-Empted Revolution and How the Pentagon Imitated Their Methods for UFO & Aliens

    By Ghailan IRGH (ANONLG.com)

    If you look closely at how absolute power works, the best kind of control doesn’t come from building massive stone walls, locking up dissidents, or tracking people with advanced radar. Real control is built inside the mind, by using manufactured fear. If a government wants to keep an uncritical populace in line, it doesn’t need an armed soldier standing on every single street corner. It just needs to convince everyone that there is an invisible, terrifying threat hiding somewhere completely out of reach.

    Back in March 2004 (more than 20 years ago!), my published Indonesian book “Salah Paham tentang Setan, Jin, Roh, Hantu, dan Sihir” mapped out the exact psychological blueprint of this trick. The book broke down how sensory illusions, weird natural shifts in electromagnetic fields, and state-backed mysticism have been weaponized throughout history to steer how large groups of people behave.

    Fast forward to the geopolitics of the 2020s. Suddenly, the United States government is obsessed with “Transmedium UAPs” and mysterious anomalies lurking in the deep ocean. This isn’t a sudden breakthrough in cosmic discovery. It is a brilliant, modernized reflection of an ancient maritime power play.

    The Ken Arok Horror: Why the Elite Fear the Streets

    To understand why a state feels the need to invent a ghost in the deep sea, you have to look at the massive physical vulnerability of a human ruler.

    Back in 1222, an ordinary guy from East Java—a known bandit, commoner, and laborer named Ken Arok (1182–1227)—completely ruined the illusion that kings were holy, untouchable beings. Armed with nothing but a cursed dagger (keris) and cold, calculated ambition, he assassinated Tunggul Ametung, the ruler of Tumapel. Ken Arok didn’t just take the throne to rule as Sri Rajasa Bhatara Sang Amurwabhumi; he also claimed the ex-king’s extraordinarily beautiful wife, Ken Dedes. In the context of 13th-century Javanese realism, this was a raw, bare-chested society. Power was highly visual, immediate, and completely unvarnished by institutional camouflage.

    Ken Arok’s successful coup sent a terrifying message to the Javanese aristocracy: if a commoner can make a king bleed, then any peasant can disrupt a dynasty. For the royal families that followed, this piece of history was the ultimate nightmare. It was a glaring vulnerability they could never allow to happen again.

    Nyi Roro Kidul: Inverting the Threat into the Ocean (1586)

    When Panembahan Senopati founded the Islamic Mataram Kingdom in 1586, the royal house knew that standard walls and standing armies weren’t enough to stop the next Ken Arok. They needed something smarter, so they turned to political mysticism. The state came up with a brilliant psychological rule: the masses fear nothing more than what they cannot see.

    This was the birth of the heavily pushed Nyi Roro Kidul narrative. The state machine started drilling a specific doctrine into the public mind: the reigning Sultan of Yogyakarta and Mataram wasn’t just a political ruler; he was spiritually married to the terrifying, supernatural Queen of the Southern Ocean.

    Suddenly, the violent, wild currents of the Indian Ocean became the state’s ultimate enforcer. The legendary Indonesian author Pramoedya Ananta Toer, along with early Dutch historical observers, noted how Western administrators were completely baffled by how easily Javanese kings maintained absolute control over massive lands. They didn’t need a giant, expensive standing army or an aggressive police state in every village.

    The fear was entirely self-enforced. A public rebellion became a spiritual impossibility. Trying to overthrow the King was no longer about fighting a mortal man; it meant declaring war on a supernatural deity ruling the deep sea. To cement this social divide, stories like Petruk Dadi Ratu (Petruk Becomes King) were deliberately woven into traditional Wayang Kulit (shadow pompous puppetry). The message to the common folk was blunt and mocking: You’re just a peasant. You don’t have the royal spiritual bloodline. Don’t even think about holding the crown.

    The 2020s Pentagon Complex: High-Tech Deep-Sea Capital Extraction

    Four hundred years later, the stage has shifted to Washington D.C., and the modern military-industrial complex is running the exact same structural playbook. In the 2020s, the U.S. defense establishment ran into a massive institutional crisis: consecutive failed financial audits under the Chief Financial Officers (CFO) Act of 1990. When the Pentagon failed its comprehensive audits, it was revealed that the department could not fully account for roughly 60% of its trilllion-dollar asset portfolio. Faced with mounting statutory pressure to explain where these public funds vanished, the national security apparatus executed a calculated geographical pivot. They shifted the “UFO Circus” out of the visible sky and plunged it into the deep ocean under the labels “Unidentified Submerged Objects” (USOs) and “Transmedium Anomalies.”

    This is the “Plankton Complex” playing out on an industrial scale. Think about the cartoon character Plankton from SpongeBob: he builds crazy, hyper-advanced laboratory lasers and high-tech artificial intelligence just to pull off the incredibly mundane task of stealing a simple burger recipe. The Pentagon operates on the same logic. They deploy highly complex, classified language about interstellar physics, exotic materials, and deep-sea national security threats. But when you strip away the sci-fi theater, the functional utility remains basic: it creates a perfect national security shield over an unresolved financial accounting black hole.

    By convincing modern citizens—who are treated exactly like the easily distracted residents of Bikini Bottom—that there is an advanced, unidentifiable threat hiding in the dark ocean trenches, the Pentagon builds an instant wall against democratic oversight. Under 10 U.S. Code § 119 (which legally isolates Special Access Programs) and strict classification laws, any genuine attempt by civilian auditors to track the money is instantly shut down in the name of classified, existential defense.

    Conclusion: The Cynical Economic Twist

    The core mechanism remains a structural mirror. Whether it’s the Javanese Mataram Kingdom in 1586 or modern Washington D.C. in the 2020s, both systems weaponized the mysteries of the deep sea to control public perception. However, the economic flow has been completely turned on its head:

    The Ancient Javanese Kings used ocean mysticism as a capital-preservation strategy. By inventing an invisible queen in the sea, they achieved absolute public obedience for free, saving the royal treasury from spending wealth on a massive mercenary army.

    The Modern Military-Industrial Complex does the opposite. They use the high-tech mysticism of “transmedium anomalies” for capital extraction. They manufacture a deep-sea ghost to ensure that an un-itemized, multi-billion-dollar funding pipeline keeps rolling in from the public forever.

    The story doesn’t need to be tidy; it just needs to remain classified and expensive. The second the threat is explained or resolved, the statutory camouflage falls apart, and the un-auditable capital ceases to flow. The ghost has to stay in the water, because an invisible threat is the only kind of threat you can never defund.

  • 68.4% of foreign residents in South Korea reported experiencing racial discrimination

    There are numerous reports and studies indicating that racial discrimination and xenophobia exist in South Korea, and they often target people from other Asian countries.

    Key points from the research include:

    • Prevalence of Discrimination: A 2019 survey by the National Human Rights Commission of Korea found that 68.4% of foreign residents in South Korea reported experiencing racial discrimination.
    • Targeting and Hierarchy: Overt racist attitudes are reportedly more commonly expressed towards immigrants from poorer Asian countries, Latin America, and Africa. Discrimination is often linked to the perceived economic status of the immigrant’s country of origin, with a “hierarchical nationhood” framework sometimes applied.
    • Specific Examples (Other Asians):
      • Immigrants from Southeast Asian countries (like Vietnam and the Philippines) have reported facing discrimination, being stereotyped, and sometimes being treated as second-class citizens, often in contexts related to marriage or labor migration.
      • People of Chinese descent (including Korean Chinese, or Joseonjok) have also reported significant discrimination and xenophobia, sometimes being linked to crime-related fears.
      • Even co-ethnic diaspora migrants are sometimes “hierarchized” based on their national origin.
    • Underlying Factors: Experts suggest that South Korea’s long-standing emphasis on ethnic homogeneity and a strong sense of ethno-nationalism contributes to prejudice against those who are not considered “pure” Koreans, making it difficult for the country to fully embrace a multicultural identity.
    • Lack of Anti-Discrimination Law: South Korea has repeatedly been recommended by the UN Human Rights Committee to enact a comprehensive anti-discrimination law, but attempts have faced obstacles and stalled, which is seen as a contributing factor to the persistence of discrimination.

  • Racial Cases in US in 2025

    Based on initial information about cases and events in 2025, here are some of the notable race-related legal cases and issues in the U.S.:

    Significant Court Cases & Legal Decisions:

    • Reverse Discrimination Standard: In June 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, holding that plaintiffs in “reverse discrimination” claims (discrimination claims brought by a member of a historical majority group, such as a white person) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act are not subject to a heightened or extra standard of proof.
    • Voting Rights in Alabama: A trial was held in February 2025 regarding Alabama’s congressional districts, which were challenged for allegedly discriminating against Black voters. In May 2025, a federal court ruled that Alabama’s 2023 congressional map violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and was enacted with racially discriminatory intent.
    • Challenging Classroom Censorship Laws (Oklahoma): A case titled Black Emergency Response Team v. Drummond challenging an Oklahoma law (HB 1775) that restricts teaching and learning about race and gender in public schools was listed as ongoing in September 2025.
    • Immigration Raids and Racial Profiling: A September 2025 Supreme Court order temporarily halted a lower court’s restriction on “roving patrols” by immigration agents, raising concerns that the decision could clear the way for increased racial profiling during immigration raids.

    Employment Discrimination (EEOC Lawsuits/Settlements):

    The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced various settlements and lawsuits concerning racial discrimination in the workplace throughout 2025, including cases involving:

    • Racial Harassment and Hostile Work Environment: Several companies, including Sinclair Broadcast Group, TNT Crane & Rigging, and Boart Longyear, settled or faced lawsuits regarding allegations of racial harassment, hostile work environments, and retaliation against Black employees.
    • Pay Discrimination: Cases were reported involving allegations of unlawful pay discrimination based on race.

    Other Notable Issues and Developments:

    • DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) Guidance: In July 2025, the Department of Justice released guidance clarifying that federal anti-discrimination laws apply to programs labeled as DEI, emphasizing that entities receiving federal funds must not discriminate on the basis of protected characteristics.
    • Hate Crimes: The Department of Justice announced numerous successful prosecutions and sentencings for hate crimes throughout the year, targeting various racial, ethnic, and religious groups.
    • Homelessness and Criminal Justice: A case challenging San Francisco’s practices regarding homelessness, Coalition on Homelessness v. City and County of San Francisco, was listed as having an ongoing status in June 2025, and is often related to issues of criminal justice and racial disparity.